It’s a short version of ‘Journey of Sir ShahRukh Khan, mainly focused on his ‘Talent’ and ‘Skills’ in my views. I’ve witnessed some comments on ‘Internet’ that they get bore reading long hectic articles, though they give me a ‘Relief’ if they are about ‘SRK’, anyhow here comes my ‘Summary’ of upcoming ‘Journey of Sir ShahRukh Khan’.

His critics always argue with his repeated roles of ‘Raj/Rahul’ or same ‘Expressions’, but I would call them ‘Non Bats’ who can’t see in ‘Dark’ unlike ‘Bats’ who can see it. Can’t they see the ‘Madness of Rahul’ as character or they are over bored with their metro life to catch the simplicity of ‘Surinder Sahni’ or they are just unaware of the concept of ‘Contrast Characters’ in film like ‘Raj’ of ‘Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi’. They call ‘Don’ not scary and more stylish, but aren’t they aware of the changing world? Or they are too fond of ‘Mother Teresa’ to see the ‘Wickedness’ of DON. Some critics have a view that ‘Swades’ was a ‘Documentary’, they seem to me addicted to Nat Geo rather ‘Celluloid’ lovers, the train scene in the movie with SRK expressions, they must be busy in enjoying pop corn or staring at chicks they don’t deserve when the scene passed by.

Some can not even feel the pride and pain at the same time of ‘Kabir Khan’ and they call themselves ‘Patriotic’, huh! Gimme a break.They argue about his ‘Versatility’, when he is the only ‘Super Star’ of today who had experienced all mediums of this trade. They are ‘Hypocrites’, those who can applaud on ‘Entertainment’ of others but not his. I guess they feel pain in throat to speak a word of ‘Praise’ for his effortless effort. Just because he don’t give 100 retakes, they put him in the league of ‘Entertainer’ rather ‘Actor’, when he qualifies in both cateogories.

Though I give a damn to such so called critics but they need something to be taught, a small way to make them look at things with new perspective, without being biased and let them understand what ‘Natural Performance’ is.

Thank You